iContact is one of the few platforms on this page whose price label tells the truth, and it still scores 5.0 out of 10 on value in our scoring. Its annual discount is exactly 15% across all 27 of its published price points, a price labeled per month really is a monthly price, and the entry tier is $9/mo. Four of the six alternatives below print an annualized figure under a “per month” heading. The problem with iContact was never the number on the slider — it is what the number buys.
We priced and scored 6 alternatives against iContact’s current plans, ranked by our internal score, and matched each to the kind of iContact account it wins for. This is not a “top 50” listicle. Every platform below is one we would put in front of someone specific, and we say who. One of them we would not move an iContact user to at all unless a single named condition applies.
Three things changed, and only one of them is the price.
The permanent free tier is gone. iContact’s pricing page now offers 30 days at $0 and then Standard from $9/mo; there is no ongoing free plan in the lineup. Two of the most-cited third-party pricing pages still publish the retired free tier at 250 contacts, so anyone comparing from a review site rather than from the vendor is comparing against a plan that no longer exists. Worth knowing before you count it as a reason to stay.
The entry plan is narrow in a way the price does not signal. Standard restricts the number of lists, segments, automations and landing pages you can hold, and caps storage at 250 MB against 500 MB on Premium. The reported Standard shape is one automation, one landing page, two contact lists and one segment. If you run a single newsletter, that is fine and this page will say so. Run two audiences and you are already on Premium at $16/mo, where the comparison changes.
Nothing connects to it. iContact scores 3.5 on our API and agent-access measure. That is the third-lowest figure across the 42 platforms we score, and it is the one number on this page that no alternative fails to beat. There is no official Model Context Protocol server, and the API is not mentioned on the pricing or features pages at all, so the plan you need to use it is published nowhere.
What has not changed is worth saying plainly, because a page of alternatives that only says bad things about the incumbent is not a comparison. iContact is still sold inside Ziff Davis, still open for signups, and its named support scores 8.0 in our rating. Of the six alternatives below, exactly one scores lower than iContact on support. Two only match it.
Ranked by our overall score. Prices are the lowest published monthly tier, billed monthly, not the annualized figure vendors print in large type.
| Platform | Score | Starting $ | Free plan | Best for | MCP | Deliverability | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brevo | 7.7 | $9/mo | Yes — 300/day | Big list, few sends | Yes | Medium | Value 8.5 vs 5.0, API 8.5 vs 3.5; automation only 6.0 vs 5.0 |
| MailerLite | 7.4 | $12/mo | Yes — 250 subs | Inbox placement | Partial | High | Deliverability 8.0 vs 6.0, value 8.0 vs 5.0, ease 8.0 vs 7.0 |
| Moosend | 7.2 | $9/mo | No — 30-day trial | Hitting the send cap | No | High | Support 8.5 vs 8.0, deliverability 8.0 vs 6.0, automation 6.5 vs 5.0 |
| EmailOctopus | 7.1 | $10/mo | Yes — 2,500 subs | One plain newsletter | No | Medium | Support 9.0 vs 8.0, value 8.5 vs 5.0; automation 4.0 vs 5.0, a real loss |
| AWeber | 6.4 | $15/mo | Documented, not sold | Agent and AI access | Yes | Medium | Support 8.5 vs 8.0, API 6.5 vs 3.5; value and automation both level, 5.0 |
| Constant Contact | 6.1 | $12/mo | No — 30-day trial | Phone support, day one | No | High | Deliverability 8.0 vs 6.0, ease 8.0 vs 7.0; value 4.0 vs 5.0, support 6.5 vs 8.0 |
Score is our published overall rating out of 10 on each platform’s SMTPedia review, not a figure built for this table. Deliverability is derived from the same reviews on a fixed threshold: High is 8.0 and above, Medium is 6.0 to 7.9. iContact’s own numbers, for comparison: overall 5.8, deliverability 6.0, automation 5.0, value 5.0, support 8.0, ease 7.0, API and agent access 3.5.
iContact prices on contacts held. Brevo prices on emails sent: $9/mo covers 5,000 sends, $29 covers 20,000, $69 covers 100,000, and the contact count is not metered at any of them. If you are a membership body, a church or an alumni association carrying thousands of records you mail four times a year, this is the largest saving on the page, and it grows with the part of your list that does nothing. The free tier sends 300 emails a day against as many as 100,000 stored contacts, which is a shape no other platform here offers.
| Measure | iContact | Brevo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Pricing value | 5.0 | 8.5 |
| API and agent access | 3.5 | 8.5 |
| Deliverability | 6.0 | 7.5 |
| Automation | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Support | 8.0 | 8.0 |
What you give up: automation on Brevo’s Free and Starter plans stops working above 2,000 contacts. That ceiling is the catch in the whole proposition: the large dormant list that makes Brevo cheap is exactly the list that pushes your automations out of the plan you came for. If any part of your iContact setup is a welcome series aimed at the full file, price Business, not Starter. Support is a match at 8.0, not an upgrade.
$9/mo
Starter, 5,000 emails sent per month
Free tier at 300 emails/day with up to 100,000 contacts. Official MCP server, the highest API and agent score on this page at 8.5. Contacts are never the billing unit.
No affiliate relationship with Brevo. Nothing on this row earns us anything.

If your open rate fell and you have already cleaned the list, the platform’s own sending reputation is the next variable, and it is the one you cannot fix from inside iContact. MailerLite rates 8.0 on deliverability against iContact’s 6.0 — the largest single-axis gain available here for the smallest price step, at $12/mo for 250 subscribers against iContact’s $9 for 500. It also scores 8.0 on ease against 7.0, so the move does not cost you a week of relearning.
| Measure | iContact | MailerLite |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 5.8 | 7.4 |
| Deliverability | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Pricing value | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| Ease of use | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| API and agent access | 3.5 | 6.5 |
| Support | 8.0 | 8.0 |
What you give up: MailerLite cut its own free plan on 16 June 2026, from 500 subscribers and 12,000 monthly emails down to 250 subscribers and 2,500 emails. Any guide describing the old limits describes a product that no longer exists, and the free tier is now smaller than the one iContact itself retired. Sending is also capped at 10 times your subscriber tier, so a 250-subscriber plan is a 2,500-email plan whatever your schedule says. And support only matches iContact at 8.0 — it does not beat it.
$12/mo
250 subscribers, annual billing 10% lower
Free plan at 250 subscribers and 2,500 emails per month since June 2026. Paid tiers run $19 at 1,000, $33 at 2,500, $49 at 5,000 and $89 at 10,000 subscribers.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not change the score, which comes from our own testing.

iContact ties your monthly send allowance to your contact count and bills for what you send beyond it. If you mail the same 500 people twice a week, that allowance is the constraint you feel, not the subscription. Moosend’s entry plan is $9/mo for 500 contacts with sends uncapped, which turns a variable bill into a fixed one. It is also the only alternative here that beats iContact on support and deliverability at once, at 8.5 and 8.0 against 8.0 and 6.0.
| Measure | iContact | Moosend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 5.8 | 7.2 |
| Deliverability | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Support | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| Automation | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| Pricing value | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| API and agent access | 3.5 | 5.0 |
What you give up: there is no free plan at all — a 30-day trial without a card, and then you pay. You are swapping iContact’s 30-day trial for another 30-day trial, so if part of your reason for leaving was that iContact stopped being free, Moosend does not answer it. Its API and agent score of 5.0 beats iContact but is the joint-lowest here, and there is no official MCP server. The annual discount of 20% is real, but it is an up-front year.
$9/mo
500 contacts, sends uncapped
Then $48/mo at 5,000 contacts and $88 at 10,000. Annual billing is 20% lower. Free trial runs 30 days and asks for no card.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not change the score, which comes from our own testing.

Standard on iContact gives you one automation. If it is empty, you are paying for a platform built around features you do not touch. EmailOctopus is the narrower product done better: $10/mo at 500 subscribers, support scored 9.0 against iContact’s 8.0, value 8.5 against 5.0, and ease 9.0 against 7.0 — matched on this page by nobody. Its free tier holds 2,500 subscribers and sends 10,000 emails a month with branding, larger than anything else here and larger than the free plan iContact discontinued. If your use of iContact is “write it, send it, read the opens”, this is a straight upgrade on every axis you actually use.
What you give up, and it is not small: automation drops from 5.0 to 4.0. This is the one row on this page where an alternative is genuinely worse than iContact at something central, and we are not going to bury it. The free plan allows 3 automations of 5 steps; anything branching, conditional or event-driven is out of scope for the product, not merely gated behind a higher tier. API and agent access is 5.0 with no official MCP server. And EmailOctopus does not publish its tiers above the entry plan — the three third-party grids we checked disagree with each other, so we will not print a number for 2,500 or 5,000 subscribers. Ask them before you commit past 500.
$10/mo
500 subscribers, $9/mo on annual billing
Free plan at 2,500 subscribers and 10,000 emails a month, with branding, three 5-step automations, three landing pages and 30 days of reporting.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not change the score, which comes from our own testing.

This is the narrowest recommendation on the page and the easiest to justify. AWeber runs a first-party Model Context Protocol server at its own domain, launched in December 2025, included on every plan at no extra cost, and listed in both the ChatGPT app directory and Claude’s connector directory. iContact has none and does not mention its REST API on either its pricing or its features page. If you want to draft a campaign, pull a segment or check a broadcast by asking an assistant rather than by opening a tab, that gap is the entire decision. Support also runs 8.5 against iContact’s 8.0.
What you give up: almost everything else is level or worse. Value, automation and deliverability are all ties, at 5.0, 5.0 and 6.0, and the entry price is $15/mo against iContact’s $9 — the most expensive starting tier here, for the lowest overall score but one. Do not move to AWeber for general reasons. Move to it for the MCP server, or do not move to it. Its free plan is a further trap: documented in the help center at 500 subscribers and 3,000 monthly emails, and where downgrades land, but neither the pricing page nor the free-plan page offers it any more — both sell a 14-day trial instead. It exists; you cannot sign up for it. A/B testing sits on Plus, not Lite.
$15/mo
Lite, 500 subscribers, annual billing 16.7% lower
Then $35/mo at 2,500 and $60 at 5,000 subscribers. Lite includes three automations and one custom segment; sending is capped at 10 times your subscriber count per month, 12 times on Plus.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not change the score, which comes from our own testing.

Constant Contact puts live phone and chat with marketing staff on its entry plan rather than reserving it for higher tiers, and rates 8.0 on deliverability against iContact’s 6.0 and 8.0 on ease against 7.0. It is the closest thing here to a like-for-like swap: same segment, same era, same kind of customer, at $12/mo for up to 500 contacts against iContact’s $9. If you stayed on iContact this long because someone answers when you call, this is the move that does not cost you that.
What you give up: this is the only row on the page where the alternative scores below iContact on two axes at once. Support is 6.5 against 8.0 — phone access on the entry plan is not the same as good support, and our reviewers did not find it to be. Value is 4.0 against 5.0, the lowest here. Automation drops to 4.5, and the A/B testing that arrives on Standard tests subject lines only, not content. There is no free plan, only a 30-day trial. And Constant Contact publishes no pricing tiers at all beyond the entry price, so the $12 is the only figure the vendor commits to before you are inside; one reconstructed grid puts 501 contacts at $50/mo, more than four times the entry price for one contact more, and we could not corroborate it to a second source. Ask for your tier in writing before you move a list.
$12/mo
Lite, up to 500 contacts, annual prepay 15% lower
Standard is $35/mo and Premium $80/mo at the same 500 contacts. Trial runs 30 days in the US with no card. No published tier pricing above 500 contacts.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not change the score, which comes from our own testing.
Every move on this page is a CSV export, a template rebuild and a domain re-verification. The differences are in what you cannot take with you.
Contacts and lists transfer. iContact exports contacts as CSV, and every platform above imports CSV with field mapping. Custom fields survive if you map them; they do not if you let the importer guess. Suppression and unsubscribe lists must be exported and imported separately and first — the single most common way a migration turns into a compliance problem, because a suppressed address that arrives as a plain contact will be mailed on day one.
Templates do not transfer. Nothing here imports an iContact template. Rebuild them, and treat it as the opportunity it is: the editor is the part of iContact reviewers most often call dated. Budget an hour per template you genuinely still send.
Automations mostly do not survive, and on iContact Standard there is usually one to lose. The narrowness of the entry plan cuts both ways: it is the reason to leave, and the reason leaving is cheap. Premium accounts with several automations should screenshot every branch before canceling — no export format carries logic across vendors.
Your sending domain has to be re-verified everywhere. SPF, DKIM and DMARC records point at your current sender and will need to point at the new one. Publish, verify, send a small campaign, and only then cancel. Never cancel first. A canceled iContact account takes its reporting history with it, and you will want last year’s numbers to judge whether the move worked.
Run both in parallel for one billing cycle. Moosend and Constant Contact both give you 30 days without a card, EmailOctopus, Brevo and MailerLite have free tiers you can test on real traffic, and AWeber gives 14 days. One month of double payment is the cheapest insurance against discovering in week three that the thing you actually needed did not come across.
No. Its pricing page offers 30 days at $0 and then Standard from $9/mo, with no ongoing free tier in the lineup. This matters more than it sounds, because two of the most-cited third-party pricing pages still publish a retired iContact free plan at 250 contacts. If you are comparing from a review site, check the vendor’s own page. Among the alternatives above, the largest genuinely free tier is EmailOctopus at 2,500 subscribers and 10,000 emails a month; Brevo’s is the most generous on contacts, at up to 100,000 stored against 300 sends a day.
We found no announcement of an end-of-life, a sunset, a forced migration or a rebrand in 2025 or 2026, and we looked for one specifically. iContact sits inside Ziff Davis, was listed as an active product in the group’s annual report for the year ended 31 December 2025, and signups are open. Treat “iContact is going away” as unsourced unless the vendor says so.
Brevo and Moosend both start at $9/mo, the same as iContact’s Standard plan, but they are cheap in different directions. Moosend’s $9 covers 500 contacts with unlimited sends, so it is cheapest for anyone who mails often. Brevo’s $9 covers 5,000 sends with contacts unmetered, so it is cheapest for anyone holding a large list they rarely mail. Work out which of the two numbers is your constraint before comparing the prices: they are not the same product priced differently, they are two different billing units.
Three of the six, and not by much: Moosend at 6.5, Brevo and MailerLite at 6.0, against iContact’s 5.0. AWeber ties it at 5.0. EmailOctopus at 4.0 and Constant Contact at 4.5 are worse. If automation is your primary reason for leaving, none of these is a large enough step to justify a migration on its own — you are looking at a different class of platform, and a heavier bill.
Not through a first-party server. iContact publishes no Model Context Protocol server, and its REST API is not mentioned on either its pricing page or its features page, so the plan required to use it is not documented publicly. Of the alternatives above, AWeber and Brevo run official MCP servers; MailerLite is reachable through community and partner layers rather than a first-party one; Moosend, EmailOctopus and Constant Contact have none. iContact’s API and agent-access score of 3.5 is the third-lowest of the 42 platforms we rate.
It depends on what your list does, not on what your organization is. A membership or alumni body carrying thousands of records it mails quarterly should price Brevo first, because contacts are not the billing unit. One that needs to reach a person by telephone should look at Constant Contact, accepting that our reviewers score its support at 6.5 against iContact’s 8.0. One that simply sends a newsletter should look at EmailOctopus, whose free tier at 2,500 subscribers covers a great many small organizations outright.
For one profile, yes, and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise. If you run a single list under 500 contacts, use the one automation slot or do not need it, value a named support contact, and have no interest in connecting the platform to anything, iContact at $9/mo is priced honestly — the annual discount is 15% exactly across every one of its 27 published price points, and a monthly figure on its site really is a monthly figure, which is not true of most of this page. The case for moving gets strong the moment you add a second audience, a branching automation, or anything that has to talk to your email platform programmatically.
This review follows our email infrastructure testing methodology. We disclose affiliate relationships in our editorial independence policy.