Brevo scores 7.7 on SMTPedia, the highest overall rating of the 42 platforms we have reviewed — so a page about leaving it has to start by admitting that most people should not. Brevo bills by email volume rather than by contact, keeps its CRM and its transactional relay on the free plan, and holds a pricing-value score of 8.5 that exactly one platform on this page matches. If you came here because your bill went up, the honest answer is usually that it did not go up as fast as it would have anywhere else.
There are two real reasons to leave, and they are narrow. Automation scores 6.0, the weakest number on Brevo’s scorecard and the weakest of every marketing platform below. And the free plan caps you at 300 emails per day, which a single send to a mid-sized list clears before lunch. We priced and scored 8 alternatives against Brevo’s current plans, ranked them by our own overall rating, and named the one axis each of them actually wins on. Where a platform wins nothing for you, we say so.
Three specific gaps send people to this page, and only two of them survive contact with the pricing table.
The daily cap, not the monthly one. Brevo’s free plan allows up to 100,000 stored contacts but meters sending at 300 emails per day. That is an unusual shape: most free plans cap the list and let you send to all of it, while Brevo caps the send and lets the list grow. A 4,000-subscriber newsletter is inside the contact limit and roughly fourteen days away from delivering one issue. The cap lifts on every paid plan, including Starter at $9 per month for 5,000 emails, so this is usually a $9 problem rather than a migration.
Automation depth. Brevo’s automation rating of 6.0 is the number that actually justifies a move. Klaviyo and ActiveCampaign both score 9.5 there, a gap of three and a half points on a ten-point scale, which is the widest single-category gap on this page. If your reason for leaving is a branching flow you cannot build, the move is defensible. If it is anything else, read the value column first.
The feature you are looking for may be one tier up, not one vendor over. A/B testing, landing pages and automation without a contact ceiling all sit on Business at $69 per month for 20,000 emails. Several people arrive here having compared Brevo’s Starter plan against a competitor’s mid tier.
Ranked by SMTPedia overall score. Every platform here has a full review on this site, so every score in the table is a measured one rather than a number invented for the comparison.
| Platform | Score | Starting $ | Free plan | Best for | MCP | Deliverability | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMTP2GO | 7.5 | $15/mo | Yes | App owners who never send campaigns | Yes | High | Support 9.0 vs 8.0, deliverability 8.5 vs 7.5; automation 3.0 vs 6.0 |
| MailerLite | 7.4 | $19/mo | Yes | Small lists that send often | Partial | High | Deliverability 8.0 vs 7.5; value 8.0 vs 8.5, automation tied at 6.0 |
| Resend | 7.4 | $20/mo | Yes | Developers who want email as code | Yes | Medium | API/MCP 9.5 vs 8.5; deliverability 6.5 vs 7.5, no campaign UI |
| Sender | 7.3 | $11/mo | Yes | Free-tier senders who need automation | No | Low | Automation 7.5 vs 6.0 on a free plan with no daily cap; deliverability 5.5 vs 7.5 |
| Klaviyo | 7.3 | $30/mo | Yes | Ecommerce stores with product data | Yes | High | Automation 9.5 vs 6.0; value 3.5 vs 8.5, the widest value gap here |
| ActiveCampaign | 7.2 | $15/mo | No | B2B teams running conditional logic | Yes | High | Automation 9.5 vs 6.0 and deliverability 8.5 vs 7.5; value 5.0 vs 8.5 |
| EmailOctopus | 7.1 | $20/mo | Yes | Writers who want the bill to stay small | No | Medium | Support 9.0 vs 8.0, value tied at 8.5; automation 4.0 vs 6.0 |
| Postmark | 7.1 | $15/mo | Yes | Receipts and password resets that must land | Yes | High | Deliverability 9.0 vs 7.5, the highest of 42 reviews; value 5.0 vs 8.5 |
Scores are SMTPedia overall ratings out of 10, taken from each platform’s own review on this site. Deliverability bands are derived from our deliverability sub-score: High is 8.0 and above, Medium is 6.0 to 7.9, Low is below 6.0. Brevo itself scores 7.7 overall and 7.5 on deliverability, which places it in the Medium band.

A large share of Brevo accounts never open the campaign builder. If yours sends password resets, invoices and notification email from an application and nothing else, you are paying for a marketing suite to move transactional mail, and SMTP2GO does that one job better on both numbers that matter for it. Deliverability is 8.5 against Brevo’s 7.5, support is 9.0 against 8.0, and phone support is included on every paid plan rather than reserved for a top tier. Entry pricing is $15 per month for 10,000 emails, rising to $75 per month at 100,000.
| Measure | Brevo | SMTP2GO |
|---|---|---|
| Deliverability score | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Support score | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| Phone support | Business tier | All paid plans |
| Automation score | 6.0 | 3.0 |
| Campaign builder | Included | Not the product |
| Official MCP server | Yes | Yes |
$15/mo
Starter, 10,000 emails per month
Professional runs $75 per month for 100,000 emails. A free tier exists but we have only a single source for its limits, so we are not quoting a number for it here.

Brevo charges for emails sent; MailerLite charges for subscribers stored. That single difference decides which one is cheaper for you, and it is arithmetic rather than opinion. A 1,000-person list mailed twice a week is 8,000 emails a month, which sits inside Brevo’s Starter plan at $9 and inside MailerLite’s Comfort plan at $19. Mail that same list daily and it becomes 30,000 emails: Brevo moves past its $29 tier while MailerLite stays at $19, because the list never grew. High frequency against a small list is where MailerLite wins, and it wins with a deliverability score of 8.0 against Brevo’s 7.5.
| Measure | Brevo | MailerLite |
|---|---|---|
| Billing unit | Emails sent | Subscribers stored |
| Deliverability score | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Free plan sending cap | 300/day | No daily cap |
| Free plan capacity | Up to 100,000 contacts | 250 subscribers, 2,500 emails |
| Pricing value score | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| Automation score | 6.0 | 6.0 |
$19/mo
Comfort, 1,000 subscribers
Comfort is $33 at 2,500 subscribers. Power runs $39 and $49 at the same two tiers. The free plan covers 250 subscribers and 2,500 emails per month.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not affect our score, which is set before any partnership.
Resend scores 9.5 on API and MCP against Brevo’s 8.5, and the difference is not a feature list but a posture: email is defined in your codebase and deployed with it. Pricing is $20 per month for 50,000 emails, with overage at $0.90 per thousand, and the free tier covers 3,000 emails per month capped at 100 per day. That daily cap is worth noticing: it is a third of Brevo’s free allowance, so the free plan here is for development, not for production.
$20/mo
Pro, 50,000 emails per month
Overage is $0.90 per thousand. Free tier covers 3,000 emails per month and 100 per day. Dedicated IP is $30 per month on Scale only.
This is the one platform here that beats Brevo on both of the complaints that bring people to this page, and it does it on the free tier. Sender’s free plan carries 2,500 subscribers and 15,000 emails per month with automation included, metered monthly rather than daily. Against Brevo’s 300 emails per day, that is fifty times the headroom for a single send, and the automation score is 7.5 against Brevo’s 6.0 — on a plan that costs nothing. Paid pricing starts at $11 per month for 5,000 subscribers and $22 at 10,000.
| Measure | Brevo | Sender |
|---|---|---|
| Automation score | 6.0 | 7.5 |
| Automation on free plan | Limited by daily cap | Included |
| Free plan metering | 300 emails/day | 15,000 emails/month |
| Entry paid price | $9/mo | $11/mo, 5,000 subscribers |
| Deliverability score | 7.5 | 5.5 |
| Official MCP server | Yes | No |
$11/mo
Standard, 5,000 subscribers
Standard is $22 at 10,000 subscribers. The free plan covers 2,500 subscribers and 15,000 emails per month with automation included.

Klaviyo and ActiveCampaign both score 9.5 on automation, and they win it on different ground. Klaviyo’s case is data: it ingests your catalogue, carts and order history and triggers on them, so a browse-abandonment flow that knows the product, the price and the stock level is a default rather than a project. Against Brevo’s automation score of 6.0, this is the widest capability gap on the page. Pricing starts at $30 per month for 1,000 profiles, reaching $100 at 5,000 and $150 at 10,000. SMS is billed separately.
| Measure | Brevo | Klaviyo |
|---|---|---|
| Automation score | 6.0 | 9.5 |
| Deliverability score | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| Ecommerce data triggers | Basic | Catalogue, cart and order native |
| Billing unit | Emails sent | Active profiles stored |
| Pricing value score | 8.5 | 3.5 |
| Support score | 8.0 | 7.0 |
$30/mo
Email plan, 1,000 active profiles
Rises to $100 at 5,000 profiles and $150 at 10,000. The free plan covers 250 active profiles and 500 emails per month. SMS is priced separately.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not affect our score, which is set before any partnership.

Where Klaviyo wins on product data, ActiveCampaign wins on conditional structure. Its automation score of 9.5 comes from the depth of the builder itself: nested conditions, goals that pull contacts forward, lead scoring that writes back into the CRM. It is also the only entry on this page that is above Brevo on automation and on deliverability simultaneously, at 8.5 against 7.5. Pricing starts at $15 per month billed annually for 1,000 contacts, or $19 month to month.
| Measure | Brevo | ActiveCampaign |
|---|---|---|
| Automation score | 6.0 | 9.5 |
| Deliverability score | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Conditional logic and lead scoring | Limited | Core of the product |
| Free plan | Yes | None, 14-day trial only |
| Pricing value score | 8.5 | 5.0 |
| Support score | 8.0 | 6.5 |
$15/mo
Starter, 1,000 contacts, billed annually
Month-to-month billing is $19. There is no free plan; evaluation is a 14-day trial.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not affect our score, which is set before any partnership.

Across all eight platforms on this page, EmailOctopus is the single one whose pricing-value score of 8.5 equals Brevo’s. Everything else here is paid for somewhere. Its support score of 9.0 also beats Brevo’s 8.0, which matters more than it sounds for a one-person operation. The free plan carries 2,500 subscribers and 10,000 emails per month with EmailOctopus branding and three automations of up to five steps; paid plans run $20 at 2,500 subscribers, $31.50 at 5,000 and $44.50 at 10,000. Compared to Brevo’s free tier, the trade is a monthly allowance of 10,000 emails instead of a hard ceiling of 300 per day.
$20/mo
Pro, 2,500 subscribers
$31.50 at 5,000 subscribers and $44.50 at 10,000. Free plan covers 2,500 subscribers and 10,000 emails per month.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not affect our score, which is set before any partnership.

Postmark’s deliverability score of 9.0 is not merely above Brevo’s 7.5, it is the highest of every platform on SMTPedia. It earns that by refusing the marketing traffic that degrades a shared pool, which is also the reason its automation score is 4.0. Pricing is $15 per month for 10,000 emails and $55 for 50,000, with overage at $1.80 per thousand on the lower tiers. One structural detail is worth knowing before you compare: transactional and broadcast email are billed against the same unit, with no separate credit pool, so a newsletter consumes the same allowance as your receipts.
$15/mo
10,000 emails per month
$55 per month at 50,000 emails. Overage runs $1.80 per thousand on the lower tiers. Free tier is 100 emails per month.
We may earn a commission if you sign up through this link. It does not affect our score, which is set before any partnership.
On our numbers, no. Brevo scores 8.5 on pricing value and 7.7 overall, the highest overall rating of the 42 platforms we have reviewed. EmailOctopus matches the value score at 8.5 but rates 7.1 overall and drops automation from 6.0 to 4.0. Sender is cheaper on the free tier but scores 5.5 on deliverability against Brevo’s 7.5. Every alternative on this page trades something measurable away, which is why the page opens by saying most people should stay.
Klaviyo and ActiveCampaign tie at 9.5, against Brevo’s 6.0, and they win on different ground. Klaviyo triggers on catalogue, cart and order data, so it suits an ecommerce store. ActiveCampaign wins on conditional structure, lead scoring and CRM write-back, so it suits a B2B sales process. If your automation problem is about products, take Klaviyo; if it is about people moving through stages, take ActiveCampaign.
Any paid Brevo plan removes the daily cap, starting at $9 per month for 5,000 emails. That is almost always cheaper than migrating. If you need to stay on a free tier, Sender allows 15,000 emails per month with no daily ceiling and EmailOctopus allows 10,000, but Sender’s deliverability score of 5.5 and EmailOctopus’s automation score of 4.0 are the price of those allowances.
It depends entirely on how often you mail, because they meter different things. Brevo bills emails sent; MailerLite bills subscribers stored. A 1,000-person list mailed twice a week is about 8,000 emails a month and costs $9 on Brevo Starter against $19 on MailerLite Comfort. Mail that same list daily, about 30,000 emails, and Brevo moves past its $29 tier while MailerLite stays at $19. High frequency favours MailerLite, low frequency favours Brevo.
Five of the eight: SMTP2GO, Resend, Klaviyo, ActiveCampaign and Postmark. MailerLite is partial. Sender and EmailOctopus have none. Brevo has an official server and scores 8.5 on our API and MCP rating, so this is not usually a reason to leave — Resend is the only one clearly ahead, at 9.5.
It depends which way you go. Five platforms here rate above Brevo’s 7.5: Postmark at 9.0, SMTP2GO and ActiveCampaign at 8.5, MailerLite and Klaviyo at 8.0. Three rate below it: EmailOctopus at 7.0, Resend at 6.5 and Sender at 5.5. Whichever you choose, expect a short dip regardless while the new provider’s pool establishes a history for your domain.
This review follows our email infrastructure testing methodology. We disclose affiliate relationships in our editorial independence policy.